A reflection on Plato’s Philebus

I have previously discussed the nature of pleasure, and have staked my flag in opposition to the hedonistic life. However, I also think it rash to condemn pleasure itself, as it very well could act as an important aspect of our development. As such in this reflection, I will examine the cost of removing pleasure from our own lives before considering the way in which we can implement pleasure in the course of development.

To begin with, we should examine the insensate life, to determine if excising pleasure is a solution to a life of addiction. A person who rejects all forms of pleasure, withdrawing into a sharp form of asceticism, is on the same path as someone who rejects the world, preferring internal contemplation to external action (see on Pure Contemplation). However, a person who pursues this path ignores the possibility that pleasure, as a facet of the human condition, is potentially critical part of human life.

This ascetic, if they are true to their beliefs, must reject pleasure in all its forms. They will not only reject the most extravagant versions of sensation but even its plainer cousins. It is not a matter of abstaining from meat and fine wines but food and drink. It is not a rejection of comfortable clothing or a soft bed, but all protection and sleep. Going to a logical extreme, the ascetic rejects life in its entirety. To conform to their beliefs with true conviction, they should lay still and allow the wasting effects of exposure, starvation and thirst to ravage their frames, destroying the mortal prison of their soul.

However, if we reject the idea of pleasure as pure evil (see on Pleasure), then we can instead begin to see it more clearly as a tool, something that we can utilise to shape our lives and achieve our goals. In fact, I would posit that in the absence of pleasure humanity would languish, unable to be motivated to any goal, slowly decaying into nothingness as the species rots from apathy – pain unable to motivate our senseless bodies.

So with this in mind, we must attempt not to avoid pleasure, but to use pleasure justly. I would argue that this requires us to pursue an understanding of the good life, and how we can delay gratification to stoke the fires in our hearts. Even more important, we should shape our natures so that we derive pleasure from good acts: creation, improvement and selfless service to others. Only then will we mix pleasure and just action in the correct amounts.

Original text

Plato’s Philebus

Painting

Emil Brack, The Discussion, c.1890

3 Replies to “On Admixture”

  1. “we must attempt not to avoid pleasure, but to use pleasure justly”

    As you mentioned in “On the Good” and in “Names” and “Definitions” only is the meaning you are trying to convey through the use of the word justice solely known to yourself it is even then fogged by your incomplete understanding of what the concept could even mean.

    So in this light of this twice blurred mirror pray tell how can one use pleasure “justly”?

    Like

    1. As I wrote in “On Pleasure” I believe that pleasure is in and of itself neither good nor evil but merely a tool which motivates action, the result of which is evil or good dependant upon a myriad of factors – most of which are beyond our control.

      I would posit that to pursue pleasure as an ends unto itself is surely folly – the life of an addict – but to take pleasure in doing good is a part of the experience of goodness.

      Both of these answers have sidestepped the real crux of your question – how do we know that the pleasure we acquire is the result of good or bad action – a difficult query indeed.

      If we accept justice as a facet of goodness, then to enjoy pleasure justly we must find pleasure in the creation or conduct of the good.

      Unfortunately, as I concluded in ‘on the Good’ I am unsure as to what this ‘Good’ refers at this point of my journey. Even more troubling – in ‘on Knowledge’ I began to question the ability of humans to ever understand the good with our limited faculties.

      However, the absence of perfect knowledge is not an excuse for inaction – itself a choice and activity. Thus as a placeholder I would suggest that the good is the pursuit of knowledge about the good – more simply: truth.

      With this answer in mind, to enjoy pleasure justly I believe we should learn to take pleasure in pursuit of truth

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: